5. Industry Case Studies
5. Industry Case Studies
Series: Industry Case Studies in Explainable AI (XAI)
Article 1: How FinTech Firms Use XAI to Build Trust
Key Idea: FinTech (Financial Technology) firms operate in a domain where trust is currency. Whether it’s fraud detection, credit scoring, or robo-advisors, customers won’t adopt opaque “black box” models unless they understand why the system’s decisions are fair.
-
Define the term clearly: XAI (Explainable Artificial Intelligence) refers to techniques and methods that make AI decisions transparent, interpretable, and justifiable.
-
Case study angle:
-
Credit scoring with explainable features (income stability, spending patterns) instead of only hidden neural nets.
-
Fraud detection systems that show “reason codes” for flagged transactions.
-
Robo-advisors that can justify portfolio recommendations in plain language.
-
-
Critical thinking questions:
-
How does a bank balance the tension between explainability (customer trust) and model accuracy (business efficiency)?
-
What unintended consequences might occur if explanations are too simple or misleading?
-
Article 2: Healthcare AI: The Role of Explainability in Diagnostics
Key Idea: In healthcare, an AI recommendation can affect life-or-death decisions. Explainability is not optional—it is ethically required.
-
Define key term: Diagnostics refers to the process of identifying disease or conditions from patient data. AI can assist but must show its reasoning path.
-
Case study angle:
-
Medical imaging AI (detecting cancer in X-rays or MRIs) with heat maps that highlight suspicious areas.
-
Clinical decision support systems that provide a ranked list of possible diagnoses with supporting evidence.
-
FDA-approved AI tools that must demonstrate transparency to regulators.
-
-
Critical thinking questions:
-
Should patients have the right to demand an explanation from AI systems used in their treatment?
-
How might “explainability” differ between a radiologist, a nurse, and the patient themselves?
-
Article 3: Explainability in Self-Driving Cars: Lessons from Tesla and Waymo
Key Idea: Autonomous vehicles don’t just move people—they carry responsibility. When an accident occurs, the first question is always: Why did the AI act that way?
-
Define context: Self-driving AI integrates perception (sensors, cameras, LIDAR), prediction (other vehicles’ movements), and planning (deciding when to accelerate, brake, or turn).
-
Case study angle:
-
Tesla’s reliance on vision-only systems vs. Waymo’s multi-sensor approach.
-
NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board) investigations into crashes where explainability gaps slowed accountability.
-
“Black box” driving logs vs. interpretable “decision trees” for accident reconstruction.
-
-
Critical thinking questions:
-
Should regulators mandate real-time explainability in autonomous cars, or is post-incident explanation enough?
-
What happens when explanations reveal biases in training data (e.g., cars misdetecting jaywalkers at night)?
-
Article 4: XAI in Security and Surveillance: A Double-Edged Sword
Key Idea: In surveillance, explainability ensures accountability—but it can also expose system weaknesses that bad actors might exploit.
-
Define context: Surveillance AI includes facial recognition, anomaly detection in public spaces, and predictive policing.
-
Case study angle:
-
Law enforcement using explainable face-matching scores to justify arrests.
-
Airports applying anomaly detection with transparent “reason codes.”
-
Controversies around predictive policing—how explainability reveals embedded biases against certain communities.
-
-
Critical thinking questions:
-
Does explainability empower citizens (greater transparency) or empower authorities (better justification of invasive actions)?
-
How do we balance fairness and security when explanations expose the logic of surveillance systems to potential manipulation?
-
Comments
Post a Comment